Why Societies Always Create Enemies
Every society, at some point, defines an enemy.
Sometimes it’s external.
Sometimes it’s internal.
Sometimes it shifts depending on the moment.
But the pattern remains.
There is always a “they.”
And that “they” plays a role far more important than most people realize.
Because enemies are not just accidental.
They are psychologically and socially functional.
The Need for Clarity in a Complex World
The world is complicated.
Problems are layered.
Causes are unclear.
Solutions are rarely simple.
But the human mind prefers clarity.
An enemy provides that clarity.
Instead of:
* “There are multiple factors causing this issue”
It becomes:
* “They are responsible”
This simplifies reality.
And simplified reality is easier to act on.
Even if it’s incomplete.
Identity Is Built Through Opposition
Groups don’t just form around shared values.
They form around shared opposition.
It’s easier to agree on:
* What is wrong
* What is unacceptable
* Who is the problem
Than on:
* What is right
* What should be built
* How things should work
So opposition becomes a shortcut to identity.
“We are not them.”
And that alone can create a strong sense of belonging.
Emotional Energy Needs Direction
Societies carry emotional undercurrents:
* Frustration
* Fear
* Uncertainty
These emotions don’t disappear.
They look for direction.
An enemy provides a target.
Instead of diffuse discomfort, you get focused anger.
And focused anger feels more manageable.
It creates a sense of action—even if no real solution is being addressed.
Scapegoating as a Social Mechanism
When systems are under pressure, they often redirect attention.
Instead of examining complex structures, focus shifts to:
* Individuals
* Groups
* Outliers
These targets become symbols of the problem.
This is the process of scapegoating.
It simplifies responsibility.
And it creates a narrative that feels complete.
This dynamic is explored in How Society Uses "Weird" People as Scapegoats & Punching Bags.
The danger is not just unfair blame.
It’s the illusion that the real issue has been identified—when it hasn’t.
The Role of Media and Amplification
Enemies don’t just emerge.
They are often amplified.
Certain stories are highlighted.
Certain behaviors are repeated.
Certain narratives are reinforced.
Over time, this creates familiarity.
And familiarity creates belief.
As explored in How Media Manipulates Your Anger to Control You, emotional framing plays a key role.
The more something is presented as threatening or problematic, the more it feels that way.
Even if the underlying reality is more nuanced.
Why People Accept the Narrative
Most people don’t actively seek enemies.
They accept them because:
* The narrative is clear
* Others seem to agree
* It aligns with existing emotions
And once accepted, it becomes self-reinforcing.
* Evidence that supports the narrative is noticed
* Contradictory information is ignored
* The belief strengthens over time
This is not deliberate bias.
It’s how the mind maintains consistency.
The Function of Division
Enemies create division.
But division has a side effect:
It organizes attention.
When people are focused on:
* Opposing each other
* Defending positions
* Reacting to perceived threats
They are less likely to:
* Examine larger systems
* Question deeper structures
* Engage in complex analysis
Conflict simplifies focus.
And simplified focus is easier to manage.
Why the Enemy Keeps Changing
If you observe closely, the “enemy” is rarely permanent.
It evolves.
Shifts.
Transforms.
This is because the function remains—even if the target changes.
The system doesn’t need a specific enemy.
It needs the presence of one.
Because the presence maintains:
* Identity
* Emotional direction
* Social cohesion
The Cost of Constant Opposition
Living in a state of continuous opposition has consequences.
Individually:
* Increased stress
* Reduced clarity
* Reactive thinking
Collectively:
* Polarization
* Loss of nuance
* Breakdown of dialogue
Over time, everything becomes framed as conflict.
And when everything is conflict, understanding declines.
How to See Beyond the Enemy
You don’t need to ignore real problems.
But you can change how you interpret them.
Look for Complexity
If something is framed too simply, it likely is.
Ask:
* “What factors are being overlooked?”
Separate Emotion from Analysis
Strong emotional reactions are signals—but not conclusions.
Pause before forming judgment.
Question the Framing
Instead of asking:
* “Who is the problem?”
Ask:
* “How is this problem being defined?”
Resist Automatic Alignment
You don’t need to pick a side immediately.
Understanding often requires stepping outside immediate reactions.
The Real Insight
Societies don’t create enemies because they are inherently hostile.
They create them because enemies serve a function.
They:
* Simplify complexity
* Strengthen identity
* Direct emotion
* Organize attention
But these benefits come with a cost.
They reduce understanding.
They increase division.
They replace analysis with reaction.
And once you see that pattern clearly, something changes:
You stop accepting every “enemy” at face value.
And start asking a deeper question:
“What role is this enemy playing—and who benefits from it?”
That question doesn’t eliminate conflict.
But it gives you distance from it.
And in that distance, clarity begins.
CTA
If you found this article helpful, share this with a friend or a family member 😉
References & Citations
* René Girard — Violence and the Sacred
* Carl Schmitt — The Concept of the Political
* Jonathan Haidt — The Righteous Mind
* Gustave Le Bon — The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind
* George Orwell — Notes on Nationalism